Archive for the ‘GWOT’ Category

Obama Jabs Czarina

July 25, 2007

The New York Sun

Senator Obama is escalating his criticism of Senator Clinton‘s record on the Iraq war, using a Democratic presidential debate last night to belittle her attempt to force the Pentagon to release plans for withdrawing American troops.

“I think it’s terrific that she’s asking for plans from the Pentagon, and I think the Pentagon response was ridiculous,” the Illinois senator said in a response unprompted by a specific question about Mrs. Clinton, before targeting her initial support for the Iraq invasion: “But what I also know is that the time for us to ask how we were going to get out of Iraq was before we went in.”

It seems to me that the Democrats have “forgotten” (for political reasons) THE WHY this nation is at war.

Advertisements

Pentagon SLAPS Down On Hillary!

July 19, 2007

From my friend Spree:

Hillary Gets Pentagon Slapped

Stolen from Spree…this never ceases to amaze me either. I was just over at BlandlyUrbane’s place reading and commenting on another bleeding heart liberal communist pinko moron Andrew “Moosetwt” Sullivan. He is one of those wanna-be generals as well. These idiots never stop.

[hillary+clinton1.jpg]

 

Pentagon Tells Hillary Clinton :She Boosts Enemy Propaganda

 

In The News:

It is about damn time the Pentagon tells the surrender crowd, especially Hillary Clinton, who changes her mind as soon as the “polls’ tell her to, how damaging their public desire to force America’s defeat is to our National Security and how it demoralizes our troops!!!

WASHINGTON – The Pentagon told Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton that her questions about how the U.S. plans to eventually withdraw from Iraq boosts enemy propaganda.

In a stinging rebuke to a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Undersecretary of Defense Eric Edelman responded to questions Clinton raised in May in which she urged the Pentagon to start planning now for the withdrawal of American forces.

A copy of Edelman’s response, dated July 16, was obtained Thursday by The Associated Press.

“Premature and public discussion of the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq reinforces enemy propaganda that the United States will abandon its allies in Iraq, much as we are perceived to have done in Vietnam, Lebanon and Somalia,” Edelman wrote.

He added that “such talk understandably unnerves the very same Iraqi allies we are asking to assume enormous personal risks.”

Here is Undersecretary of Defense Eric Edelman Bio. I would say he is much more qualified to know what he is talking about, and shows perfectly, that Hillary, DOESN’T.

 

awwwwwwwwwwwwwwww, Hillary is gonna complain to his boss because she doesn’t LIKE THE TRUTH.

Clinton spokesman Philippe Reines called Edelman’s answer “at once outrageous and dangerous,” and said the senator would respond to his boss, Defense Secretary Robert Gates.

Gates would do well to tell her to kiss his ass, if she cannot handle the truth, then she shouldn’t be doing everything in her power to HELP THE ENEMY.

 

(If Gates has to show more diplomacy because of his position, well I don’t, sooooo HILLARY, KISS “MY” ASS“)

 

The “left” is atwitter with indignation…. How dare the Pentagon tell it like it is? Actually I think they are just pissed because, finally, years after they should have, our admin and our military are finally deciding to weigh in on the war in the media.

 

More on this from Fox News, (I am only adding this link cause it makes “certain” peoples heads explode)

 

In the meantime, we have the Sunni’s ending their parliament boycott, which brings Iraq one step closer to those political benchmarks that will be due in September.

 

In other news, our U.S Diplomats seem to be seeing progress in Iraq, which of course the left is completely ignoring, because it just doesn’t fit with their defeatist attitude.

 

We already covered General Petraeus and his fascinating interview telling us how much progress is being made in Iraq as well as showing us what difficulties lies ahead.

 

Take Our Country Back posted this morning here about the latest Centcom news.

 

If you missed it in the previous post, head over to USA Today to see exactly why Victory in Iraq is vital to the U.S.

 

On The Blogs:

 

Also remember to take a look at how the Iraqi citizens are banding together to help the U.S, Coalition and Iraqi Security Forces to help route out insurgents and al-Qaeda members.

 

Amy Proctor from Bottom Line Up Front shows us that when a liberal MSM actually decides to leave the comfort of DC to embed with our troops in Iraq, they come away with a whole different attitude… CNN war correspondents are no exception. (3 minute video.)

Debbie Hamilton from Right Truth gives us more about the al-Qaeda leader in Iraq that we captured on July 4th, 2007. Seems he is singing like a little birdie.

 

Mike’s America has some awesome, related Quick Takes. Cartoons included!!!!! That first quote cracked me up.

 

Demediacratic Nation points out something I have mentioned before, the “progressive liberals” only want us to listen to the Commanders on the ground in iraq, IF those commanders are saying what they want. Otherwise, why listen to them?

 

Gazing at the Flag says there should be a special place in hell for those that try to scam others using our fallen heroes families.

 

Back to Hillary Clinton for a second, Miss Beth’s Victory Dance brings us some of her more memorable quotes.

 

Tanker Brothers brings us some words from a Gold Star Mother, for those unaware of that term, it means a mother who has lost a child in the military.

 

The Tygrrrr Express shows us some of the good, the bad and the ugly.

 

Woman Honor Thyself brings us Bur-Kas Bawling and Bellowing.

 

Finally, Heroes, from Yankee Mom.

 

This has been my look, so far, from around the blogosphere and in the news.

 

More might be coming.

 

ALSO SEE:

 

And The Enemy Depends on American Democrats

Base Weary of Hillary

July 16, 2007

WaPo The Editorialist: Hillary’s Real Iraq Strategy

Fred Hiatt explains how Hillary Clinton is finessing her Iraq war position to appease the Democratic base, even though the base still doesn’t like her position. “Democratic primary voters do not want to hear of adjustments, redeployments, reductions. They want all troops out, now. That is why Clinton will devote one paragraph to the military defense ‘of our very real strategic national interests in this region’ and more than 10 pages to troop withdrawal” … Markus Prior explains how greater media access in the United States has actually reduced the number of Americans who are political informed: “The most significant effect of more media choice is not the wider dissemination of political news but mounting inequality in political involvement. Some people follow news more closely than in the past, but many others avoid it altogether.”

Sound Bytes and Hillary…Politics For The Stupid

July 10, 2007

Hillary Jilton Moonbat Clintonista’s Bafoonery

Here is another piece which we shall tear apart. It really is too easy and one of these days, the trolls are going to smarten up. Until then, these items will continue to be printed. Hillary is a glorified troll. She speaks in sound bytes and feel goods.

From The Hill: Clinton presents plan to end Iraq war

Democratic presidential front-runner Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) Tuesday unveiled her plan to bring U.S. troops home from Iraq within 60 days of taking office.

“The Plan” of hers is still under the veil. “The Plan” also has the tone as that of RWR when he was taking office and had stated that one of the first things he would do was to bring our people home that Iran had kidnapped and held hostage for 444 days, thanks to Carter.

Note to Hillary…you ain’t no Reagan. No one of any intelligence is listening to you.

Clinton wants President Bush to end the war, but has said she would bring the troops home if the current administration fails to act.

Repeating the first entry doesn’t explain what The Plan is.

“The right strategy before the surge and post-escalation is the same: Start bringing home America’s troops now,” Clinton said in Iowa. “We have heard for years now that as the Iraqis stand up, our troops will stand down. Every year, we hear about how next year they may start coming home. Now we are hearing a new version of that yet again from the president as he has more troops in Iraq than ever and the Iraqi government is more fractured and ineffective than ever.”

Another distortion of the Leftinistra. Where are her assertions originating from? Who said what and can it be verified? The Leftinistra thrive on the “unnamed source” and the unsubstantiated. It makes it easier to explain the woopsies.

I seem to recall that Hillary APPROVED the strategy of General Petraeus as the Senate UNANIMOUSLY confirmed the General and His Plan. As soon as the plan was initiated, all of a sudden, it has failed and it is JUST now getting under way. It takes time for this war stuff, you know.

We are WINNING the war now and the Hillary Turds want to cut and run. Why do they fear a victory in Iraq? Easy to answer…they would have to admit that they have politicized the war and are directly at fault at the deaths on both sides of the war and they cannot afford that. It would be much better for them if no blame came their way.

Clinton promised to initiate phased redeployment as soon as she takes office. However, as part of her plan, specialized forces would remain to fight terrorists.

Where would she redeploy to? If we don’t have enough forces in theater to deal with the terrorists now, what makes her think that “specialized forces” (friggin’ moron can’t even get the terminology right) would fair any better?

With the absence of U.S. troops, the senator hopes to stabilize the country by focusing on aid efforts that put money in the hands of the Iraqi people.

 

In addition, Clinton plans to bring together U.S. allies, global powers and Iraq’s neighbors to stabilize the country.

Ah. I see. Money fixes all things. Aid fixes all things. We have seen in recent years what bribe money does, haven’t we? How many Islamic “nations” have we helped and aided only to have them “blow us up”? How many embassies were attacked? How many Americans were kidnapped and murdered? Where is the current evidence of gratitude from “nations we have aided”?

She mentioned “the absence of troops” and focusing on aid, etc. What about those “specialized forces”? What happened to them? Aren’t they troops?

She also mentioned “global powers” and “Iraq’s neighbors” to be used to “stabilize the country”. Is she on drugs? Don’t our CONgress Critters have to take those unconstitutional random drug screenings? What global powers and which neighbors?

Has anyone spotted the Bullshit Meter here besides me?