Archive for the ‘fundraising’ Category

Hillary: The Sickness of The Beguiled

November 24, 2007

~Snooper~

The Budding Leninist, Czarina, the Modern American Progressive, is a Clear and Present Danger to the very survival of Traditional America. Traditional America is under attack by these budding Leninists, calling themselves “Progressives”. If one carefully examines the mantra of said same, one will see that which they prattle and yammer upon is Socialism with a smattering of Communism, disguised as “progressive”.


What are these “progressives” progressing towards? No one on “their” side of the aisle, whichever that side might be, has explained their talking dulls satisfactorily, have they? Does anyone even know? I have performed a scientific study and I do believe that our team has discovered the ailment causing the sickness that “progressivism” is. It is kind of scary and without further ado, we provide a CT Scan of a “progressive’ we found wondering aimlessly around SE Texas, incoherent, inaudible and in dire need of a rubber room.


And there you have it. We call it Hillaroncasinseptocacka. Like the Sci Fi Borg technology, the human brain was injected with this nanoprobes and this victim of this tragic attack fought the assimilation to their ultimate peril. It deteriorated the thought process to the point that the victim actually drowned in its own drivel. The recorded dying words were, “Bush did it”.

The nanoprobes disintegrated immediately following death.

In other news, we find that the Hillaryscare Campaign is in a tizzy over their stature in Iowa. It seems as though that damn Obama character is actually pulling ahead.

Naturally, her apparent falling from grace could be a direct result of the criminal activity she has conveniently side-stepped and her money-bag and emotional standard bearers are charlatans.

Some are saying that her woes are catching up with her now that Czarina is making a play to The Big House…woops…The White House.

As the Czarina expresses her feigned caring drivel towards our troops, we are reminded how our troops think of her. As for her sexual inclinations, I really don’t care but the rumor is still out there and I am with Don…it is just a rumor at this point and it really should be left well enough alone.

With her woes in Iowa making the road ahead indeed troublesome, her paperwork is being held hostage someplace and is due to be released but the delay-game is “Rather” irksome. I would rather see these documents that are sure to pin-point her qualifications to be CIC…without them, what is her justification?

The Dema Sutra positions of the Budding Leninist, as intriguing and hard to track and keep up with are “Rather” typical of a liar, charlatan and someone with something to hide, I find her inability to maintain eye contact all too revealing.

Her ever “evolving” and “progressive” (whatever that means) pseudonyms for whatever position she takes with whatever the prevailing winds are at the time, is always so evasive and unclear to the minds of the intellectually sound. With the continuing scandals surfacing, I find it interesting that she even shows herself in the public eye. The Clinton machine pathway is littered with the bodies of those that know the Real Deal.

What should serve as an adequate wake-up call to the American People is being shunted to ground and her supporters include terrorists and their moppets.

Carl Rove says she can be beat but the road to defeat for the Czarina would be an easier path if her drones would wake-up to smell the coffee and to call into question her patriotism or better yet, ask the question as to what she is actually patriotic towards.

Advertisements

Corruption, Campaign Finance Fraud and Hillary Clinton

October 19, 2007

We have shown multiple instances in which Hillary Clinton has associated herself with corruption, illegal financing and fraud.

BACKGROUND:

The Hillary Clinton Supporter, norman Hsu has been posted about here, here and here… also here.

Six members of the Paw family, each listing the house at 41 Shelbourne Ave. in Daly City, Calif., as their residence, have donated a combined $45,000 to the Democratic senator from New York since 2005, for her presidential campaign, her Senate re-election last year and her political action committee. In all, the six Paws have donated a total of $200,000 to Democratic candidates since 2005, election records show. Their donations closely follow contributions made by a wealthy New York businessman.(See Donation record via WSJ here)

It isn’t obvious how the Paw family is able to afford such political largess. Records show they own a gift shop and live in a 1,280-square-foot house that they recently refinanced for $270,000. William Paw, the 64-year-old head of the household, is a mail carrier with the U.S. Postal Service who earns about $49,000 a year, according to a union representative. Alice Paw, also 64, is a homemaker. The couple’s grown children have jobs ranging from account manager at a software company to “attendance liaison” at a local public high school. One is listed on campaign records as an executive at a mutual fund. (Source)

So far what we have is a family of limited means donating an extraordinary amount of money (considering their income) to Hillary Clinton and in smaller part to other Democrats, that lives in a house that was once listed as Mr. Hsu’s home address, which makes that connection very obvious.

Norman Hsu, as shown at a couple of the links above was later discovered to be a fugitive from the law.

Hillary Clinton’s association with the 527 Group, America Coming Together, financed by George Soros, which has been fined $775,000 for violating campaign finance laws.

Her association with that group is via, Harold Ickes, president of America Coming Together, who just “happened to be a former Bill Clinton Top Aide.

The group, whose president was former top Clinton aide Harold Ickes, agreed to pay the penalty without acknowledging any violations. It had registered as both a 527 organization, named after a portion of the I.R.S. tax code, and as a federal political action committee. But through its 527, it had raised and spent large amounts of money that did not fall under strict federal donation limits.

Critics of 527 groups have contended that they proliferated in the last cycle through a loophole around the ban on soft money — unregulated money — that was imposed under the McCain-Feingold campaign finance laws. Democrats used 527’s to a wide advantage in the 2004 election cycle, with contributions from the likes of billionaire George Soros. Republicans also used them, with major donors like Bob Perry of Texas.

Another Clinton supporter, Mayor Samuel Rivera, has also been arrested on corruption charges.

Lets not forget the timeline of the historic civil suit, Paul v Clinton in Los Angeles Superior Court, where Hillary will finally have to answer some hard questions, under oath.

In the following timeline, we will see apparent evidence of Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign understating over $750,000 in contributions to her 2000 Senate campaign, from one Peter Paul.

Evidently, Hillary’s campaign initially denied even knowing Peter Paul, and then later, admitted meeting him but never had a conversation regarding his contribution to her campaign.

Hillary Clinton will finally be under oath in the historic civil suit, Paul v Clinton in Los Angeles Superior Court. Voters are going to see the details of the greatest campaign finance fraud in history… Read the rest of that and see the timeline for yourself.

TODAY we see reports from LA Times about further dubious campaign contributions to Hillary Clinton:

NEW YORK — Something remarkable happened at 44 Henry St., a grimy Chinatown tenement with peeling walls. It also happened nearby at a dimly lighted apartment building with trash bins clustered by the front door.

And again not too far away, at 88 E. Broadway beneath the Manhattan bridge, where vendors chatter in Mandarin and Fujianese as they hawk rubber sandals and bargain-basement clothes.

All three locations, along with scores of others scattered throughout some of the poorest Chinese neighborhoods in Queens, Brooklyn and the Bronx, have been swept by an extraordinary impulse to shower money on one particular presidential candidate — Democratic front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Dishwashers, waiters and others whose jobs and dilapidated home addresses seem to make them unpromising targets for political fundraisers are pouring $1,000 and $2,000 contributions into Clinton’s campaign treasury. In April, a single fundraiser in an area long known for its gritty urban poverty yielded a whopping $380,000. When Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) ran for president in 2004, he received $24,000 from Chinatown.

Read the whole three page article for yourself.. the consistent and constant association with criminals, corruption and fraud should be a red flag to the FBI and federal election officials and I would be willing to bet that if investigations haven’t already been started, they will be.

With over a year to go until the 2008 elections, there is plenty of time for the proper authorities to get to the bottom of these associations and contributions from sources that, in some cases, cannot even be found.

In one instance, Clinton campaign alleged Yi Min Liu had made a donation of $1,000 however he said he only attended a banquet but made no donation.

There is only so many times someone can claim ignorance and coincidence and Hilary Clinton and her campaign used that allotment up long ago.

People should be demanding that all of her contributions, campaign finances and donor lists be investigated and gone through with a fine toothed comb.

[Update] Suitably Flip has more incriminating evidence about Hillary Clinton’s “refunds”.

Remember, her crimes are all some “vast right wing conspiracy”.

I also have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you, contact me.

Cross posted from Wake up America

.

Hillary and Fraud…Synonymous

September 21, 2007

Yes…the two go hand in hand.

On Hillary The Rodham Clinton…Czarina

“I am not gay”…Why is this so important for her to express this. One would think that the Leftinistra would be all so pleased for one of the Rainbow Mutants aspiring to the White House. Odd, that, yes?

Hillary Clinton officially declared she’s not a lesbian – not that there’s anything wrong with that.

Then why the hoopla?

About her socialist medicine program, she states that there SHOULD be a MANDATE for every American to purchase health care. WTFO? I thought she was wanting to GIVE the program away. Now she wants everyone to buy into it!? What for? Folks get it for FREE now so why would they support her BS about having to buy into it. This woman is a class-act flake.

Richard Collins has a piece up at Townhall where the Czarina is being continually probed about her record and history of voter and campaign fraud practices that the Lame Stream Media seems to give her a free ride on. One should be asking why that is, don’t you think?

This cretin Hsu has been donating a lot more cash to Czarina than anyone has been surmising up to this point.

While I was traveling with the Gathering of Eagles and Veterans For Freedom, on a slow news day last Sunday, Slate states the following tid-bit:

The front pages are nearly free of breaking news on this slow Sunday, but there are still some interesting morsels scattered throughout the papers. The Washington Post leads with a look at the eclectic group of donors that Norman Hsu tapped in his prolific fundraising efforts for Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. Some contributors say they never met Hsu, who now sits in a Colorado prison.

Where is the Lame Stream Media on this? Had this been, aghast, a Republican, Holy Shiite Goat Man!

StopHerNow has offered a reward for felons contributing to Leftinistra presidential aspirants. Fish Wrap has a “funny” video to view on the subject as well.


At least the Daily News picked the Wanted Poster up and has a feew things to say as well.

Czarina…a Clear and Present Danger.

Hillary Clinton, The Paw Family and Norman Hsu

August 29, 2007

Cross posted from Wake up America
( The Paws, who live in this Daly City, Calif., bungalow, donated $45,000 to Hillary Clinton. )

This house was also once listed as the home address of Norman Hsu, according to public records.

Six members of the Paw family, each listing the house at 41 Shelbourne Ave. in Daly City, Calif., as their residence, have donated a combined $45,000 to the Democratic senator from New York since 2005, for her presidential campaign, her Senate re-election last year and her political action committee. In all, the six Paws have donated a total of $200,000 to Democratic candidates since 2005, election records show. Their donations closely follow contributions made by a wealthy New York businessman.(See Donation record via WSJ here)

It isn’t obvious how the Paw family is able to afford such political largess. Records show they own a gift shop and live in a 1,280-square-foot house that they recently refinanced for $270,000. William Paw, the 64-year-old head of the household, is a mail carrier with the U.S. Postal Service who earns about $49,000 a year, according to a union representative. Alice Paw, also 64, is a homemaker. The couple’s grown children have jobs ranging from account manager at a software company to “attendance liaison” at a local public high school. One is listed on campaign records as an executive at a mutual fund. (Source)

So far what we have is a family of limited means donating an extraordinary amount of money (considering their income) to Hillary Clinton and in smaller part to other Democrats, that lives in a house that was once listed as Mr. Hsu’s home address, which makes that connection very obvious.

Now lets take a look at Norman Hsu.

Norman Hsu is one of the leading political fund-raisers in the country this year. In fact, many fund-raisers say he is one of a small handful of people capable of raising more than $1 million — a major feat considering the maximum donation allowed by an individual for 2008 races is $4,600 per candidate.

[…]

Until three years ago, Mr. Hsu never made a campaign contribution to a presidential candidate, according to federal election records. Now, though, several people involved in raising money for White House candidates say Mr. Hsu is a major player.

Many “HillRaisers” — people who rustle up at least $100,000 for Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign — are dwarfed beside Mr. Hsu (pronounced “Shu”). Several people involved in Democratic presidential fund-raising say Mr. Hsu, an apparel executive, has raised well over $1 million for the New York senator’s presidential campaign, making him one of the top 20 Democratic fund-raisers in the country. The Clinton campaign doesn’t disclose such details and declined to comment for this story.

So, where are we, we have a very rich man that since 2003 has started donating to presidential campaigns, and once lived or listed his address as the same one that a modest family of limited means live in and that family has also donated to the same woman, Hillary Clinton far more than their income should allow.

So far so good right?

More about Norman Hsu from the LA Times and this is where things start to unravel because Mr. Hsu is a fugitive from the law.

WASHINGTON — For the last 15 years, California authorities have been trying to figure out what happened to a businessman named Norman Hsu, who pleaded no contest to grand theft, agreed to serve up to three years in prison and then seemed to vanish.

“He is a fugitive,” Ronald Smetana, who handled the case for the state attorney general, said in an interview. “Do you know where he is?”

Hsu, it seems, has been hiding in plain sight, at least for the last three years.

Since 2004, one Norman Hsu has been carving out a prominent place of honor among Democratic fundraisers. He has funneled hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions into party coffers, much of it earmarked for presidential hopeful Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York.

In addition to making his own contributions, Hsu has honed the practice of assembling packets of checks from contributors who bear little resemblance to the usual Democratic deep pockets: A self-described apparel executive with a variety of business interests, Hsu has focused on delivering hefty contributions from citizens who live modest lives and are neophytes in the world of campaign giving.

On Tuesday, E. Lawrence Barcella Jr. — a Washington lawyer who represents the Democratic fundraiser — confirmed that Hsu was the same man who was involved in the California case. Barcella said his client did not remember pleading to a criminal charge and facing the prospect of jail time. Hsu remembers the episode as part of a settlement with creditors when he also went through bankruptcy, Barcella said.

Now, despite Mr. Hsu’s fugitive status, Hillary Clinton’s campaign says there is no reason to return any donations made by Mr. Hsu.

The Clinton campaign said today that it saw no reason to return donations from two major campaign contributors whose donations, according to the Wall Street Journal, closely track one another.

Mr. Hsu is also slated to host a campaign fund raiser for Hillary Clinton, in Northern California on September 30, 2007.

Hsu is slated to host a Sept. 30 fund-raiser in Northern California for Clinton.

Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson said that there are no plans to return cash donated either by the Paws or by Hsu, and that the fund-raiser will go on as planned.

Is it usual for fugitives of justice to be hosting campaign fund raising events for candidates?

Is it usual for so many legal questions to surrounding a candidates contributions?

It is if you are Hillary Clinton. (Click link to see the whole time line of events)

In the following timeline, we will see apparent evidence of Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign understating over $750,000 in contributions to her 2000 Senate campaign, from one Peter Paul.

Evidently, Hillary’s campaign initially denied even knowing Peter Paul, and then later, admitted meeting him but never had a conversation regarding his contribution to her campaign.

Hillary Clinton will finally be under oath in the historic civil suit, Paul v Clinton in Los Angeles Superior Court. Voters are going to see the details of the greatest campaign finance fraud in history and the Clinton role in the collapse of Stan Lee Media.

TIMELINE.

Let us not forget the crime statistics associated with the last Clinton administration:

Crime Stats:

– Number of individuals and businesses associated with the Clinton machine who have been convicted of or pleaded guilty to crimes: 47
– Number of these convictions during Clinton’s presidency: 33
– Number of indictments/misdemeanor charges: 61
– Number of congressional witnesses who have pleaded the Fifth Amendment, fled the country to avoid testifying, or (in the case of foreign witnesses) refused to be interviewed: 122

Forgetful Clinton “friends”:

Number of times that Clinton figures who testified in court or before Congress said that they didn’t remember, didn’t know, or something similar.

Hillary Clinton 250.
Bill Kennedy 116
Harold Ickes 148
Ricki Seidman 160
Bruce Lindsey 161
Bill Burton 191
Mark Gearan 221
Mack McLarty 233
Neil Egglseston 250
John Podesta 264
Jennifer O’Connor 343
Dwight Holton
348 Patsy Thomasson 420
Jeff Eller 697

Folks, this is a the prefect example of the old adage, if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and looks like a duck, chances are, it is, indeed, a duck.

Follow all the links above and ask yourself one final question.

Will Americans vote for a person that has such close associations with fraud and crime and fugitives?

Hillary can claim all she wants that there is some vast right wing conspiracy against her, but if her actions didn’t warrant such close scrutiny then what would this vast conspiracy have to use against her?

She believes the statement alone, the words “vast right wing conspiracy” is a get out of jail free card for her to accept questionable donations, be associated with fugitives and criminals, have a fugitive host her campaign fund raisers and to claim under oath 250 times that she couldn’t remember, didn’t know or something along those lines.

I repeat what I said on a previous post, linked above, if the Democrats are foolish enough to make Hillary the nominated candidate for presidency, that is the best news the GOP could ever get.

UPDATE!!  Like any of us believe this garbage!!

“In light of the new information regarding Mr. Hsu’s outstanding warrant in California, we will be giving his contributions to charity,” Phil Singer, from the Clinton Presidential Exploratory Committee, told FOX News.

Ya.  Sure.

LinkShare  Referral  Prg

.

What Else “Is” Hillary Hiding This Time?

August 28, 2007

Hillary’s Little Green Laundry Mat

What is this?

Six members of the Paw family list this house in Daly City, Calif., as their address?

DALY CITY, Calif. — One of the biggest sources of political donations to Hillary Rodham Clinton is a tiny, lime-green bungalow that lies under the flight path from San Francisco International Airport.

 

Six members of the Paw family, each listing the house at 41 Shelbourne Ave. as their residence, have donated a combined $45,000 to the Democratic senator from New York since 2005, for her presidential campaign, her Senate re-election last year and her political action committee. In all, the six Paws have donated a total of $200,000 to Democratic candidates since 2005, election records show.

Is this where her money laundry “IS”? Naturally, we will have to determine just what the definition of “IS’ “IS”.

Simply amazing.

“There are red lights all over this one,” Mr. Cooper said.

 

There is no public record or indication Mr. Hsu reimbursed the Paw family for their political contributions.

 

For the 2008 election, individuals can donate a maximum of $4,600 per candidate — $2,300 for a primary election and $2,300 for a general election — and a total of $108,200 per election to all federal candidates and national political parties.

What does it all mean, exactly?

Hillary? What are you hiding now?

Buzz it

And this sad little one whines as well…LOL!! 

HIllary’s Money Man

July 9, 2007

This would-be, wanna-be, Queen Hillary, President of the United States, charlatanisms never cease.

Hillary’s money man

Christopher Alleva
Reading the Washington Post Sunday Style section piece on super Hillary fundraiser Bal G. Das yesterday almost sent me reaching for my Vatican Saint Recommendation Form.
Pictured in his impossibly modest midtown Manhattan office with a view of Park Avenue, where rents are north of $100 per square foot, Das is quoted, “What motivates me is leaving this world better than when I found it”

A real profile in altruism, the Post tells us:

“… Das has maxed out the amount he can personally donate while helping to raise what he calculates is more than $300,000 for the cause. Shunning big events, he’s hosted a series of small get-togethers at his Upper East Side home. Most recently, he attended a 1,200-person event of Indian American supporters (including Deepak Chopra) and a much smaller gathering where Clinton and Warren Buffett did a Steve-and-Eydie routine for wealthy supporters such as Vernon Jordan and Steven Rattner. Both events raised approximately $1 million each, according to the campaign.”

I believe this is what you call a gathering of “fat cats.”

Just as I was poised to grab my form and dash it off to the Pope I decided to do a little checking up on Mr. Das. At first I was taken in by Post’s glowing description of Mr. Das,

“A man with a cherubic face and rimless glasses, he sports brown wingtips and a tan summer suit a little short in the arms. He projects a kind of formal sincerity. While nearly everyone involved with the former first lady’s presidential quest calls the candidate Hillary, Das will refer to her only as ‘Senator Clinton.'”

My interest was further piqued by the Post saying he’s at the forefront of fundraisers with a capacity to bring 40 to 50 supremely affluent people together in an intimate setting for Mrs. Clinton’s benefit. Helpfully, the Post reminds us of a recent dust up with the Obama campaign, Senator Obama had to apologize for a staff memo that labeled Clinton as “D-Punjab

“The flap brought to light the tussle within the Democratic Party for the hearts, minds and wallets of this constituency”

So just who is Bal G. Das, super fundraiser? Mr. Das is General Counsel of InsCap Capital Management LLC http://www.inscapllc.com/das.html. formerly known as LILAC. A look at the firm’s website says Mr. Das is responsible for coordinating the firm’s legal, compliance and regulatory affairs. No, this can’t be. I thought Mr. Das was a simply a civic minded contributor just trying to make world a better place by supporting Hillary Clinton.

InsCap Capital Management is a firm involved in a highly controversial tax avoidance scheme called “leveraged life insurance.”

There are several variations to this scheme but one version has wealthy tax payers borrow money to pay life insurance premiums and deduct the interest from their current income, reducing their taxes, while receiving preferential tax treatment upon death or distribution of the policy.

I think this could be characterized as a “tax break for the rich”, Mrs. Clinton.

There you have it: Mr. Das’ occupation and personal wealth are derived directly from legislation passed in Washington. I’m so disillusioned. I thought this guy was selfless and now it turns out he’s nothing more than another rent seeker. I’m not sure contributing to Hillary Clinton campaign is going to make the world a better place, I do know it will probably fatten his wallet.

The Washington Post has swarms of reporters. Perhaps they can assign a few people to look into all these generous donors instead of wasting their readers’ time writing misleading puff pieces on them.

Obama to out raise Hillary

June 28, 2007

If there was one thing I was confident Hillary Clinton could do it was raise money. But it appears Barack Obama ain’t no slouch either:

Eager to cast their fundraising totals for the second quarter in a positive light, officials with Sen. Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign said they expect to raise less than Sen. Barack Obama — probably about $27 million, roughly what they drew in the first three months of the year.

[. . .]

Advisers in the two camps had been quietly predicting for weeks that Obama would outperform Clinton, and on Thursday, the Obama campaign unveiled a tidbit about their fortunes. They said they are in reach of having 250,000 donors for the year by the time the second fundraising quarter ends this Saturday.

David Plouffe, the Obama campaign manager, wrote in a memo that the campaign had already added about 140,000 new contributors in the last three months. “While the professional pundits are busy handicapping a big-money horse race, we have a more important goal: getting more people involved and owning a piece of this campaign,” Plouffe wrote.

Typical campaign speak by the Obama camp. Obviously each is going emphasize whatever makes their candidate look good, but lots of money and from lots of donors is rarely bad. Now if Obama could just turn some of that money and enthusiasm into improved poll numbers things might really get interesting.