Archive for the ‘Exposure’ Category

Hillary’s Tribute To The Old Smelly Hippies

October 22, 2007

Hillary’s $1M Drug Addict and Anti War Museum Porker

Yes, I know, this is old news and all but it came up in the GOP Debate this evening and Senator McCain presented and excellent rendering of his opinion.

I remember the Woodstock era and they were the smelly hippies of our time then and to build a museum honoring the anti-establishment, anti-war and anti-Americanists of that time, is all too telling to me and Hillary does not deserve to even think about running for President, let alone be the President of the United States.

I sure am glad that the museum honoring cowards and drug addicts won’t be built.

He said when he was asked about this tribute, that he thinks that no one that supports such spending as this can be the President and he also said that he was not in attendance at Woodstock because he was tied up at the time. Here is the exact quote:

“I wasn’t there. I’m sure it was a cultural and pharmaceutical event. I was tied up at the time.”

In case you are not in touch with current events, Senator McCain was a POW in North Vietnam at the time Woodstock was taking place.

That got him the ONLY standing ovation during the debate.

Good on John McCain. I think that with a little more “soap box” antics, John McCain will rise to the occasion.

Catch The Wave

Corruption, Campaign Finance Fraud and Hillary Clinton

October 19, 2007

We have shown multiple instances in which Hillary Clinton has associated herself with corruption, illegal financing and fraud.

BACKGROUND:

The Hillary Clinton Supporter, norman Hsu has been posted about here, here and here… also here.

Six members of the Paw family, each listing the house at 41 Shelbourne Ave. in Daly City, Calif., as their residence, have donated a combined $45,000 to the Democratic senator from New York since 2005, for her presidential campaign, her Senate re-election last year and her political action committee. In all, the six Paws have donated a total of $200,000 to Democratic candidates since 2005, election records show. Their donations closely follow contributions made by a wealthy New York businessman.(See Donation record via WSJ here)

It isn’t obvious how the Paw family is able to afford such political largess. Records show they own a gift shop and live in a 1,280-square-foot house that they recently refinanced for $270,000. William Paw, the 64-year-old head of the household, is a mail carrier with the U.S. Postal Service who earns about $49,000 a year, according to a union representative. Alice Paw, also 64, is a homemaker. The couple’s grown children have jobs ranging from account manager at a software company to “attendance liaison” at a local public high school. One is listed on campaign records as an executive at a mutual fund. (Source)

So far what we have is a family of limited means donating an extraordinary amount of money (considering their income) to Hillary Clinton and in smaller part to other Democrats, that lives in a house that was once listed as Mr. Hsu’s home address, which makes that connection very obvious.

Norman Hsu, as shown at a couple of the links above was later discovered to be a fugitive from the law.

Hillary Clinton’s association with the 527 Group, America Coming Together, financed by George Soros, which has been fined $775,000 for violating campaign finance laws.

Her association with that group is via, Harold Ickes, president of America Coming Together, who just “happened to be a former Bill Clinton Top Aide.

The group, whose president was former top Clinton aide Harold Ickes, agreed to pay the penalty without acknowledging any violations. It had registered as both a 527 organization, named after a portion of the I.R.S. tax code, and as a federal political action committee. But through its 527, it had raised and spent large amounts of money that did not fall under strict federal donation limits.

Critics of 527 groups have contended that they proliferated in the last cycle through a loophole around the ban on soft money — unregulated money — that was imposed under the McCain-Feingold campaign finance laws. Democrats used 527’s to a wide advantage in the 2004 election cycle, with contributions from the likes of billionaire George Soros. Republicans also used them, with major donors like Bob Perry of Texas.

Another Clinton supporter, Mayor Samuel Rivera, has also been arrested on corruption charges.

Lets not forget the timeline of the historic civil suit, Paul v Clinton in Los Angeles Superior Court, where Hillary will finally have to answer some hard questions, under oath.

In the following timeline, we will see apparent evidence of Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign understating over $750,000 in contributions to her 2000 Senate campaign, from one Peter Paul.

Evidently, Hillary’s campaign initially denied even knowing Peter Paul, and then later, admitted meeting him but never had a conversation regarding his contribution to her campaign.

Hillary Clinton will finally be under oath in the historic civil suit, Paul v Clinton in Los Angeles Superior Court. Voters are going to see the details of the greatest campaign finance fraud in history… Read the rest of that and see the timeline for yourself.

TODAY we see reports from LA Times about further dubious campaign contributions to Hillary Clinton:

NEW YORK — Something remarkable happened at 44 Henry St., a grimy Chinatown tenement with peeling walls. It also happened nearby at a dimly lighted apartment building with trash bins clustered by the front door.

And again not too far away, at 88 E. Broadway beneath the Manhattan bridge, where vendors chatter in Mandarin and Fujianese as they hawk rubber sandals and bargain-basement clothes.

All three locations, along with scores of others scattered throughout some of the poorest Chinese neighborhoods in Queens, Brooklyn and the Bronx, have been swept by an extraordinary impulse to shower money on one particular presidential candidate — Democratic front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Dishwashers, waiters and others whose jobs and dilapidated home addresses seem to make them unpromising targets for political fundraisers are pouring $1,000 and $2,000 contributions into Clinton’s campaign treasury. In April, a single fundraiser in an area long known for its gritty urban poverty yielded a whopping $380,000. When Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) ran for president in 2004, he received $24,000 from Chinatown.

Read the whole three page article for yourself.. the consistent and constant association with criminals, corruption and fraud should be a red flag to the FBI and federal election officials and I would be willing to bet that if investigations haven’t already been started, they will be.

With over a year to go until the 2008 elections, there is plenty of time for the proper authorities to get to the bottom of these associations and contributions from sources that, in some cases, cannot even be found.

In one instance, Clinton campaign alleged Yi Min Liu had made a donation of $1,000 however he said he only attended a banquet but made no donation.

There is only so many times someone can claim ignorance and coincidence and Hilary Clinton and her campaign used that allotment up long ago.

People should be demanding that all of her contributions, campaign finances and donor lists be investigated and gone through with a fine toothed comb.

[Update] Suitably Flip has more incriminating evidence about Hillary Clinton’s “refunds”.

Remember, her crimes are all some “vast right wing conspiracy”.

I also have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you, contact me.

Cross posted from Wake up America

.

Hillary Clinton, The Paw Family and Norman Hsu

August 29, 2007

Cross posted from Wake up America
( The Paws, who live in this Daly City, Calif., bungalow, donated $45,000 to Hillary Clinton. )

This house was also once listed as the home address of Norman Hsu, according to public records.

Six members of the Paw family, each listing the house at 41 Shelbourne Ave. in Daly City, Calif., as their residence, have donated a combined $45,000 to the Democratic senator from New York since 2005, for her presidential campaign, her Senate re-election last year and her political action committee. In all, the six Paws have donated a total of $200,000 to Democratic candidates since 2005, election records show. Their donations closely follow contributions made by a wealthy New York businessman.(See Donation record via WSJ here)

It isn’t obvious how the Paw family is able to afford such political largess. Records show they own a gift shop and live in a 1,280-square-foot house that they recently refinanced for $270,000. William Paw, the 64-year-old head of the household, is a mail carrier with the U.S. Postal Service who earns about $49,000 a year, according to a union representative. Alice Paw, also 64, is a homemaker. The couple’s grown children have jobs ranging from account manager at a software company to “attendance liaison” at a local public high school. One is listed on campaign records as an executive at a mutual fund. (Source)

So far what we have is a family of limited means donating an extraordinary amount of money (considering their income) to Hillary Clinton and in smaller part to other Democrats, that lives in a house that was once listed as Mr. Hsu’s home address, which makes that connection very obvious.

Now lets take a look at Norman Hsu.

Norman Hsu is one of the leading political fund-raisers in the country this year. In fact, many fund-raisers say he is one of a small handful of people capable of raising more than $1 million — a major feat considering the maximum donation allowed by an individual for 2008 races is $4,600 per candidate.

[…]

Until three years ago, Mr. Hsu never made a campaign contribution to a presidential candidate, according to federal election records. Now, though, several people involved in raising money for White House candidates say Mr. Hsu is a major player.

Many “HillRaisers” — people who rustle up at least $100,000 for Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign — are dwarfed beside Mr. Hsu (pronounced “Shu”). Several people involved in Democratic presidential fund-raising say Mr. Hsu, an apparel executive, has raised well over $1 million for the New York senator’s presidential campaign, making him one of the top 20 Democratic fund-raisers in the country. The Clinton campaign doesn’t disclose such details and declined to comment for this story.

So, where are we, we have a very rich man that since 2003 has started donating to presidential campaigns, and once lived or listed his address as the same one that a modest family of limited means live in and that family has also donated to the same woman, Hillary Clinton far more than their income should allow.

So far so good right?

More about Norman Hsu from the LA Times and this is where things start to unravel because Mr. Hsu is a fugitive from the law.

WASHINGTON — For the last 15 years, California authorities have been trying to figure out what happened to a businessman named Norman Hsu, who pleaded no contest to grand theft, agreed to serve up to three years in prison and then seemed to vanish.

“He is a fugitive,” Ronald Smetana, who handled the case for the state attorney general, said in an interview. “Do you know where he is?”

Hsu, it seems, has been hiding in plain sight, at least for the last three years.

Since 2004, one Norman Hsu has been carving out a prominent place of honor among Democratic fundraisers. He has funneled hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions into party coffers, much of it earmarked for presidential hopeful Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York.

In addition to making his own contributions, Hsu has honed the practice of assembling packets of checks from contributors who bear little resemblance to the usual Democratic deep pockets: A self-described apparel executive with a variety of business interests, Hsu has focused on delivering hefty contributions from citizens who live modest lives and are neophytes in the world of campaign giving.

On Tuesday, E. Lawrence Barcella Jr. — a Washington lawyer who represents the Democratic fundraiser — confirmed that Hsu was the same man who was involved in the California case. Barcella said his client did not remember pleading to a criminal charge and facing the prospect of jail time. Hsu remembers the episode as part of a settlement with creditors when he also went through bankruptcy, Barcella said.

Now, despite Mr. Hsu’s fugitive status, Hillary Clinton’s campaign says there is no reason to return any donations made by Mr. Hsu.

The Clinton campaign said today that it saw no reason to return donations from two major campaign contributors whose donations, according to the Wall Street Journal, closely track one another.

Mr. Hsu is also slated to host a campaign fund raiser for Hillary Clinton, in Northern California on September 30, 2007.

Hsu is slated to host a Sept. 30 fund-raiser in Northern California for Clinton.

Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson said that there are no plans to return cash donated either by the Paws or by Hsu, and that the fund-raiser will go on as planned.

Is it usual for fugitives of justice to be hosting campaign fund raising events for candidates?

Is it usual for so many legal questions to surrounding a candidates contributions?

It is if you are Hillary Clinton. (Click link to see the whole time line of events)

In the following timeline, we will see apparent evidence of Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign understating over $750,000 in contributions to her 2000 Senate campaign, from one Peter Paul.

Evidently, Hillary’s campaign initially denied even knowing Peter Paul, and then later, admitted meeting him but never had a conversation regarding his contribution to her campaign.

Hillary Clinton will finally be under oath in the historic civil suit, Paul v Clinton in Los Angeles Superior Court. Voters are going to see the details of the greatest campaign finance fraud in history and the Clinton role in the collapse of Stan Lee Media.

TIMELINE.

Let us not forget the crime statistics associated with the last Clinton administration:

Crime Stats:

– Number of individuals and businesses associated with the Clinton machine who have been convicted of or pleaded guilty to crimes: 47
– Number of these convictions during Clinton’s presidency: 33
– Number of indictments/misdemeanor charges: 61
– Number of congressional witnesses who have pleaded the Fifth Amendment, fled the country to avoid testifying, or (in the case of foreign witnesses) refused to be interviewed: 122

Forgetful Clinton “friends”:

Number of times that Clinton figures who testified in court or before Congress said that they didn’t remember, didn’t know, or something similar.

Hillary Clinton 250.
Bill Kennedy 116
Harold Ickes 148
Ricki Seidman 160
Bruce Lindsey 161
Bill Burton 191
Mark Gearan 221
Mack McLarty 233
Neil Egglseston 250
John Podesta 264
Jennifer O’Connor 343
Dwight Holton
348 Patsy Thomasson 420
Jeff Eller 697

Folks, this is a the prefect example of the old adage, if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and looks like a duck, chances are, it is, indeed, a duck.

Follow all the links above and ask yourself one final question.

Will Americans vote for a person that has such close associations with fraud and crime and fugitives?

Hillary can claim all she wants that there is some vast right wing conspiracy against her, but if her actions didn’t warrant such close scrutiny then what would this vast conspiracy have to use against her?

She believes the statement alone, the words “vast right wing conspiracy” is a get out of jail free card for her to accept questionable donations, be associated with fugitives and criminals, have a fugitive host her campaign fund raisers and to claim under oath 250 times that she couldn’t remember, didn’t know or something along those lines.

I repeat what I said on a previous post, linked above, if the Democrats are foolish enough to make Hillary the nominated candidate for presidency, that is the best news the GOP could ever get.

UPDATE!!  Like any of us believe this garbage!!

“In light of the new information regarding Mr. Hsu’s outstanding warrant in California, we will be giving his contributions to charity,” Phil Singer, from the Clinton Presidential Exploratory Committee, told FOX News.

Ya.  Sure.

LinkShare  Referral  Prg

.

Go Publius!!

August 3, 2007

Czarinas’ Thesis Is Now Made Available

Go Publius posted a link at the Hot Rodham Blog that presents a copy of the long suppressed Alinsky Thesis.

Freedom Underground has the PDF as well.

Go download the PDF file and read it. Or, got to Go Publius and read one page at a time.

Future posts on this WILL BE forthcoming.

Presidential Candidate Forum – Chris Matthews Speechless

June 20, 2007

Fruit-Loops and Loony-Tunes Abound

Does Hillary Have A Woman Problem?

June 16, 2007

Interesting question. It all depends on your point of view. If you are a fem-nazi, the answer is an overwhelming yes. If you aren’t a fem-nazi, the spread is muddied. It is also dependant upon who is doing the asking and who is doing the reporting.

I did a totally unscientific and undocumented and personal “poll”. I asked five women, two of which I know personally, one of them being my wife, the following question; “With what you know at this very moment about Hillary Rodham Clinton, would you vote for Hillary for the President of The United States?

Answers:

1. Woman #1…Spouse…”You have GOT to be kidding!”

I took that as a no.

2. Woman #2…friend of spouse…”That is a really stupid question. I wouldn’t vote for that poli-tramp if she was the second to the last woman in the world!”

Another no.

3. Woman #3…me Mum…”You should be bloody well ashamed of asking such nonsense. Cods wallop!” (accompanied by the Evil Eye only mums can emit.)

Another no.

4. Woman #4…in line at the local Kroger…”Who the hell are you and what do you want?” (accompanied by a panicked deer-in-the-headlight gaze.)

An undecided?

5. Woman #5…at the post office…a pleasant smile, a gleam in the eye and the head cocked to one side, the gum chewing had stopped. There was no answer. (she was a blond.)

A yes?

My poll of 5 women revealed that 3 out of 5 say no, 1 gets paranoid and 1 stops chewing gum and gets a glazed look.

Theoretically, there is a more scientific poll here:

We Are On The Move

June 16, 2007

 

 

 

 

The Washington Times

www.washingtontimes.com


Inside Politics

By Jennifer Harper
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Published June 15, 2007

Yee-haw
Folks in Texas have a few notions about welcoming Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton on her campaign stop there today.

Dick Collins, founder of the Dallas-based anti-Hillary “educational” group Stop Her Now, will fly a giant aerial banner over downtown Dallas this afternoon. The New York Democrat’s plane is due to stop and refuel sometime during that period.

“We want to make sure Senator Clinton receives a proper Texas welcome,” Mr. Collins said. “Our mission is to follow Hillary across the country, exposing her liberal ideology. Senator Clinton makes this easy when she drops into our back yard.”

he banner is rumored to say something along the lines of “rescue America from the radical ideas of Hillary.” The group has a substantial Web site, a blog, MySpace and Facebook pages and its own YouTube channel.

“Our Facebook group boasts more members than Senator Mike Gravel, Senator Chris Dodd, Senator Sam Brownback, Governor Mike Huckabee, Representative Tom Tancredo, and Representative Duncan Hunter. We have become the most interactive presidential education Web site on the Internet,” Mr. Collins said.

The Clintonistas

June 15, 2007

In Hillary’s Senate Financial Disclosure Report, there are listings as to just how much cash these two are raking in.  How dare they whine about how the rich are exploiting the poor.  I don’t begrudge people making as much money they so choose to make.  That is one of the MANY advantages this country allows people to do.  There are NO guarantees.  But,  if you are going to make zillions of US dollars, don’t run around whining about all those evil businesses with their “windfall” profits and saying you are going to take your ill gotten wealth (gains) and redistribute it to those in need, all the while pocketing YOUR wealth, ill gotten or otherwise.

On the speaking circuit, the former President Clinton made more than $10 million in paid speeches last year, according to new filings that show he and his presidential- candidate wife have at least $10 million in the bank, and may have closer to $50 million.   As a side-bar, I wouldn’t pay a single wooden nickel to hear him speak about anything.

And, apparently, the Clintons are deeply involved with CLSA, the fifth largest bank in the world.

CLSA is a leading brokerage, investment banking and private equity group in the Asia-Pacific Markets. Founded in 1986 and headquartered in Hong Kong, CLSA’s major shareholder is France’s Credit Agricole, which merged in 2003 with Credit Lyonnais, to form the 5th largest bank in the world by assets and the 5th largest bank in the world by Tier One capital. CLSA enjoys substantial staff ownership which contributes to its independent stance and operations.

Somethings just make me wonder.

The Clintons And That Big Bad Oil Thing

June 15, 2007

Now I know why Hillary was prattling along about when she said she was going to take that “windfall profits from oil” monies away from the oil companies. She and Billy Bob were going to take their oil money, cut and run. They did this so that IF…IF…IF she and Billy Bob get into the White House…again; God forbid…they plan on raping the oil companies. As me mum says, “No worries.” They will already have taken their millions out.

 

From WaPo: Clintons Dissolve Blind Financial Trust. Millions in Stock Converted to Cash to Avoid Campaign Conflicts

Sounds OK, right? Sure. Happens all the time. What with their reputations of being class-act charlatans, they have decided to get their stuff out ahead of the game. I wish I could take $1,000 and turn it into $100,000.

 

Bill and Hillary Clinton have dissolved the blind trust that has managed their investments since they entered the White House in 1993, converting all stocks to cash to avoid financial conflicts as she runs for president, according to documents to be filed today with federal ethics officials.

The documents reviewed by The Washington Post provide the most complete accounting of how the Clintons accrued the $5 million to $25 million in the trust — nearly all since leaving the White House — through investments in foreign companies, oil giants and drugmakers without their input or knowledge and without public disclosure.

My double standards palsy detectors, bells and whistles are resounding on an exponential level. Foreign companies…outsourcing? Don’t these two whine about that topic? Why is it OK for them to utilize that concept but no one else? Oil giants…what? Those evil fuel dollar mongers? No wonder she hasn’t been whining (lately) about all that windfall profiteering. They are raking it in, folks. Such two-faced double standards are completely unacceptable. Drugmakers? Hello? Those evil pharmaceutical outfits? You know. The ones that are ripping off America?

Why is it OK for the Leftinistra to make millions of dollars under dubious ways and means (as they so often assert) but no one else can? Is everyone OK with this? I’m not.

The Clintons. The epitome of frauds, charlatans and two-faced robber barons.

Good God Almighty.

Bill’s Been Told…Keep It Zipped!

June 14, 2007

And no more embarr”ass”ments.  Or else! So who runs the family? Golly Sarge!

What’s going on with the old Horndog-in-Chief? There hasn’t been a whiff of scandal for months. Bill Clinton’s friendship with Canada’s ‘blonde bombshell’ MP Belinda Stronach is over, although nobody is sure what it was in the first place.

They looked hot a year ago, with the charisma of power, but Belinda has since quit Canadian politics to return to the family firm selling car parts to Detroit, and is having an affair with a ‘tough guy’ from the Maple Leafs ice hockey team.

The only other name to surface is that of Demi Moore, the Hollywood star best known for posing naked twice on the cover of Vanity Fair. And all that erupted then was a complaint from Moore’s toy-boy husband, Ashton Kutcher, that Clinton ignored him and “was hitting on my wife” right through a Hollywood dinner. No stains on little black dresses here. This is a serious issue. The fates of nations hinge on it. Hillary Clinton is the front-runner for the White House in next year’s election. If Bill gets caught with someone other than his wife in the next 18 months, the damage potential is incalculable.

It is a pretty sad state of “affairs” that articles like this are even written.  I doubt Hillary will ever see the inside of the White House Resident Quarters as a resident but,  if on the outside chance she does, do you think she will change the carpets and rearrange some things?

And the Secret Service had better make sure every thing is made out of that stuff Nerf Balls are made of.  Hillary has a habit of throwing things.