Yeah. Right, Hillary. And just what would that be? This old warrior would like to know what YOUR combat experience is that entitles YOU to know what your “new strategy” might be. Isn’t it YOUR party that makes the claim that a CIC should have some military background? Wasn’t YOUR “better half” a draft dodger? And wasn’t that YOU that supported him?
Your little waltz around the issue was “Rather” revealing: Newsbloggers
Voting against the troop funding bill just passed by Congress, Hillary Clinton said America needs a “new strategy” in fighting the Islamic radicals. Perhaps we should consider the Clinton strategy put into effect in the late 1990s by her husband Bill.
Khobar Towers attack? No response. Bin Laden declares war on America? No response. The bombing of our two embassies in East Africa? Clinton drops a bomb on a pharmaceutical factory in the Sudan and fires a couple of cruise missiles into Afghanistan, killing two camels. The suicide attack against the U.S.S. Cole? No response.
Hillary? Would your “new strategy” be that as your husband’s strategy was? Nothing?
“I fully support our troops,” but the measure “fails to compel the president to give our troops a new strategy in Iraq ,” Clinton said. aol news
I know I have mentioned this before, Miss Czarina, BUT wasn’t it YOU and the Senate that confirmed the new Commander and wasn’t it YOU and the Senate that agreed with the “new strategy”?
If you really do support the troops, Miss Czarina,how about shutting up and actually support them instead of posturing for political gain?