This is old news and as old news goes, sometimes it is good to go back in time. The Democrats don’t like going back in time because it fogs their senses; always having to defend their ever changing positions. The Leftinistra (the armies of the socialist liberals) begin whining about “that was in the past…let’s move forward” leaving the impression that actions of the past have no bearing on the present and/or future.
In my constant and everyday readings and research, I run across all manner of rantings, ravings, certifiable kook fringe fruit loops from both sides of the political aisle and spectrum. After sifting through countless files on paper and electronically stored on multiple scan disks as well as on the internet (wonderful thing the Al Gore invented), I ran across this blast from the past.
From The Hillary Project Does anyone remember this, other than us?
“When Hillary went into a hissy fit over Condoleeza Rice’s criticisms of Bill Clinton’s terror record, she made a rather ridiculous claim. She said, “I’m certain that if my husband and his national security team had been shown a classified report entitled ‘Bin Laden Determined To Attack Inside the United States’ he would have taken it more seriously than history suggests it was taken by our current president and his national security team.”
First, Clinton shouldn’t have needed a note. Our country was attacked repeated during his administration, and he did nothing about it.
Second, Hillary’s reference to the August 6, 2001 PDB is another silly attempt at distorting the truth. That PDB has been discussed here at B4B in the past, and anyone who has actually read it knows that there was no actionable intelligence in the PDB. That the information provided in it would have never prevent 9/11.
But hey, since when do Democrats care about the truth?”
Truth, to a democrat, is whatever it takes for the Almighty Power to be engaged. Period.